A counterintuitive argument against financial literacy, from Freakonomics.com
We then turn to the topic of financial literacy, which we’ve written about
before. You’ll hear from
Alan Krueger, chairman of the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers; and from Krueger’s predecessor,
Austan Goolsbee, who
talks about the role that Americans’ financial illiteracy played in the Great Recession.
You’ll then hear from two guests who offer up radically different solutions to our financial illiteracy. One is
Annamaria Lusardi, an economist at George Washington University, who has spent the past 10 years
studying the topic, and believes that education is the way out:
LUSARDI: In the same way we start people, you know, in school just reading and writing, you know, from the very beginning. We don’t teach literature so that people go on and write “War and Peace,” but we teach it so that people can appreciate a good book.
Next is
Lauren Willis, a legal scholar who previously worked at the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission. She has
argued against widespread financial education, recommending instead a new cadre of financial advisers and greater transparency and regulation in the financial industry:
WILLIS: It’s sort of like saying, well we should start teaching everybody to be their own doctor, teaching everyone to be their own mechanic, you know, something like that, terribly inefficient to do that. Not only is it inefficient, but it has this sort of culture of blaming the consumer. You know, you’re the one who didn’t figure this all out.
Posts
